ELECTION PROTEST

Weekly Updates

Week 167: September 9 – 15, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 167 weeks (or roughly 1,173 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts in BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.  Since the MANUAL recount began on 2 April 2018 and ended on 5 March 2019, it took the PET 11 months to complete the MANUAL recount of the said 3 provinces.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
had battery fluids in them
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET began REVIEWING both parties’ objections on March 2019.  We are still waiting for the Tribunal to inform us of the RESULTS of the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 166: September 2 – 8, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 166 weeks (or roughly 1,166 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts in BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.  Since the MANUAL recount began on 2 April 2018 and ended on 5 March 2019, it took the PET 11 months to complete the MANUAL recount of the said 3 provinces.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
had battery fluids in them
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET began REVIEWING both parties’ objections on March 2019.  We are still waiting for the Tribunal to inform us of the RESULTS of the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 165: August 26 – September 1, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 165 weeks (or roughly 1,159 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts in BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.  Since the MANUAL recount began on 2 April 2018 and ended on 5 March 2019, it took the PET 11 months to complete the MANUAL recount of the said 3 provinces.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
had battery fluids in them
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET began REVIEWING both parties’ objections on March 2019.  We are still waiting for the Tribunal to inform us of the RESULTS of the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 164: August 19 – 25, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 164 weeks (or roughly 1,152 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts in BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.  Since the MANUAL recount began on 2 April 2018 and ended on 5 March 2019, it took the PET 11 months to complete the MANUAL recount of the said 3 provinces.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
had battery fluids in them
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET began REVIEWING both parties’ objections on March 2019.  We are still waiting for the Tribunal to inform us of the RESULTS of the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 163: August 12 – 18, 2019

On 16 August 2019, BBM recived a Notice from the PET denying its request to decrypt and print the ballots images of clustered precinct #19 in Caramoan, Camarines Sur.

On 16 August 2019, BBM recived a Notice from the PET denying its request to decrypt and print the ballots images of clustered precinct #19 in Caramoan, Camarines Sur.

(click here to see the 16 August 2019 Notice from the PET)

After 163 weeks (or roughly 1,145 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts in BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.  Since the MANUAL recount began on 2 April 2018 and ended on 5 March 2019, it took the PET 11 months to complete the MANUAL recount of the said 3 provinces.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
had battery fluids in them
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET began REVIEWING both parties’ objections on March 2019.  We are still waiting for the Tribunal to inform us of the RESULTS of the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 162: August 5 – 11, 2019

On 9 August 2019, BBM filed an Extremely Urgent Motion wherein he asked the PET to set his Election Protest for Preliminary Conference.

On 9 August 2019, BBM filed an Extremely Urgent Motion wherein he asked the PET to set his Election Protest for Preliminary Conference.

It has been more than five (5) months since the recount of BBM’s votes in the 3 pilot provinces was terminated. Thus, BBM asked the PET to schedule a Preliminary Conference so that he can present evidence to support his case. According to BBM, “Public interest demands that this electoral controversy be resolved with dispatch to determine once and for all the genuine choice of the electorate for the contested position.

(click here to see the 9 August 2019 Extremely Urgent Motion from BBM)

After 162 weeks (or roughly 1,138 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 161: July 29 – August 4, 2019

On 31 July 2019, BBM received a Manifestation from the COMELEC wherein it explained the “defects” of the ballot images :

On 31 July 2019, BBM received a Manifestation from the COMELEC wherein it explained the “defects” of the ballot images :

1. The absence of ballot images in some of the clustered precincts in Camarines Sur and Iloilo was due to the SD cards being “permanently deleted.” This happened because the Electoral Boards (EBs) pressed the “rezero” command “before shutting down the Vote Counting Machines (VCMs);”

2. The non-chronological sequencing of the ballot images was due to COMELEC’s desire to eliminate “any possible link between the ballot and the voter.” “Accordingly, to ensure ballot secrecy, the sequence of storing the ballot images in the baloots-list.csv report should be scrambled, and not in choronological order;”

COMELEC also requested permission to decrypt and print the ballot images of CP 19 of Caramoan, Camarines Sur in order to address the issue of excess ballot images in the said precinct.

(click here to see the 31 July 2019 Manifestation from COMELEC)

After 161 weeks (or roughly 1,131 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 160: July 22 – 28, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 160 weeks (or roughly 1,124 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 159: July 15 – 21, 2019

On 17 July 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to :

On 17 July 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to :

1. Defer Action on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation filed on 10 December 2018 and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion filed on 26 March 2019 “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with the PET Rules;

2. Deny Robredo’s Urgent Motion to Immediately Resolve all Pending Incidents for being premature. According to the PET.  “The figures submitted by protestee are merely speculative. In arriving at the figures, protestee presumes that all her claims will be admitted by the Tribunal. This premise is fundamentally flawed;”

3. Direct the Comelec and the Board of Election Insprectors (BEIs) in Camarines Sur to explain the absence of ballot images in several clustered precincts in Camarines Sur within 10 non-extendible days from notice; and

4. Direct the Comelec to comment on BBM’s Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion, particularly the matter regarding the excess / sequencing of ballot images within 10 non-extendible days from notice.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

After 159 weeks (or roughly 1,117 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

• On 17 July 2019, the PET resolved to “defer action” on BBM’s his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion “until such time that an initial determination has been made on the protest” in accordance with Rule 65 of the 2010 PET Rules.

(click here to see the 17 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 158: July 8 – 14, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 158 weeks (or roughly 1,110 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 157: July 1 – 7, 2019

On 5 July 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to Note the Letter-Explanation from the Acting City Treasurer of Tanjay, Negros Oriental regarding an incident report in Poblacion 4, Tanjay.

On 5 July 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to Note the Letter-Explanation from the Acting City Treasurer of Tanjay, Negros Oriental regarding an incident report in Poblacion 4, Tanjay.

(click here to see the 5 July 2019 Notice from the PET)

After 157 weeks (or roughly 1,103 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 156: June 24 – 30, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 156 weeks (or roughly 1,096 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 155: June 17 – 23, 2019

On 19 June 2019, BBM received an Urgent Motion from Robredo wherein she asked the PET “to immediately resolve all pending incidents relating to the revision of BBM’s pilot provinces” namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental.” In her Motion, Robredo showed different figures in which she claimed to be a confirmation of her “victory.”

On 19 June 2019, BBM received an Urgent Motion from Robredo wherein she asked the PET “to immediately resolve all pending incidents relating to the revision of BBM’s pilot provinces” namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental.” In her Motion, Robredo showed different figures in which she claimed to be a confirmation of her “victory.”

It is worth mentioning that the PET consistently maintained that “As already mentioned, during the revision proceedings, there is yet no final deduction or addition of votes. The purpose of the revision is simply to conduct a physical recount of the ballots.”

(click here to see the 19 June 2019 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

After 155 weeks (or roughly 1,089 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 154: June 10 – 16, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 154 weeks (or roughly 1,082 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 153: June 3 – 9, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 153 weeks (or roughly 1,075 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 152: May 27 – June 2, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 152 weeks (or roughly 1,068 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 151: May 20 – 26, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 151 weeks (or roughly 1,061 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 150: May 13 – 19, 2019

No significant developments

No significant developments

After 150 weeks (or roughly 1,054 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 149: May 6 – 12, 2019

On 9 May 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to :

On 9 May 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET which resolved to :

1. Grant the request of BBM’s lawyer, Atty. George M. Garcia, that he be given a copy of the Liquidation Report regarding the expenses incurred during the revision of the pilot provinces;

2. Direct the PET Ad Hoc Committee to furnish the said Liquidation Report within 10 days from receipt of notice;

3. Note the Letter-Explanation from the Acting City Treasurer of Tanjay, Negros Oriental regarding several Incident Reports in numerours clustered precincts in Tanjay City;

4. Note the Letter from the City Treasurer of Bayawan, Negros Oriental regarding to an Incident Report in a clustered precinct in Bayawan City; and

5. Note the Memorandum from the PET Retrieval Team Head regarding the delivery of certain ballot boxes inCamarines Sur.

(click here to see the 9 May 2019 Notice from the PET)

After 149 weeks (or roughly 1,047 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)

Week 148: April 29 – May 5, 2019

On 3 May 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET granting COMELEC’s request to transfer 200 units of Vote Counting Machine (VCM) bins used during the 2016 elections to Hagonoy, Taguig City.

On 3 May 2019, BBM received a Notice from the PET granting COMELEC’s request to transfer 200 units of Vote Counting Machine (VCM) bins used during the 2016 elections to Hagonoy, Taguig City.

The Tribunal further resolved to :

1. Note the revision report on ballot boxes containing revised wet/damaged ballots/other election paraphernalia; and  

2. Confirm the revision of decrypted ballot images and other election paraphernalia in several clustered precincts in Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental.

(click here to see the 3 May 2019 Notice from the PET)

After 148 weeks (or roughly 1,040 days) :

The PET finished the MANUAL recount of ballots in all the clustered precincts of BBM’s three (3) pilot provinces, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. As of 5 March 2019, the MANUAL recount of ballots in these 3 provinces have been completed.

The next stage is what is referred to as the PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION (“PA”) of votes. The PA stage is where the parties submit their OBJECTIONS to the ballots that were MANUALLY counted so that the PET can REVIEW the same.

For his part, BBM’s objections included the presence of UNREADABLE ballots because they were :

wet
 covered with dried fish & garbage
 burned with cigarette butts
and so much more!

When it came to the READABLE ballots, BBM’s revisors discovered that :

 majority of the ballots contained SHADINGS of 25% or less
there were FAKE BALLOTS in the audit logs

The PET has been REVIEWING these objections since March 2019. We are still waiting for the Tribunal to COMPLETE the PA stage of BBM’s election protest.

This is why the Tribunal has consistently said that, “it is highly premature x x x to claim a deduction of votes as the Tribunal has yet to rule on the objections and claims of the parties in the appreciation stage. In fact, the very purpose of ballot appreciation by the Tribunal is to avoid disenfranchisement of the electorate by ascertaining their true will and intent.”

After the PET completes the PA stage, it will then direct the parties to submit their FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE [undertaking 14 of 21]. This is where BBM will prove that he lost a SUBSTANTIAL number of votes in the 3 pilot provinces.

We are still waiting to hear from the PET.

– – – – –

Listed below are the “sensitive” and important issues surrounding BBM’s protest :

1. Whether or not to apply the 25% shading threshold percentage or the 50% shading threshold percentage in the recounting of votes

Robredo’s Motion to Direct the Head Revisors to Apply the 25% threshold percentage in the revision, recount and re-appreciation of ballots

• In a Resolution dated 10 April 2018, the PET denied Robredo’s Ex Parte Motion.

(click here to see the 10 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 24 April 2018, the PET required BBM and the COMELEC to comment on Robredo’s Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 24 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 2 May 2018, Robredo filed an Urgent Motion for Reconsideration.

(click here to see the 2 May 2018 Urgent Motion from Robredo)

• On 28 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to Robredo’s Motion

(click here to see the 28 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM received a Manifestation from the Office of the Solicitor General.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Manifestation from the OSG)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to note the OSG’s Manifestation and Motion

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 26 July 2018, BBM received a Comment from the COMELEC

(click here to see the 26 July 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

N.B.
Although the PET did not CATEGORICALLY decide on the 25% versus 50% shading threshold, they instructed the revisors – on 25 September 2018 — to just refer to the Election Returns :

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET directing Head Revisors to refer to the election returns to verify the total number of votes as read and counted by the voting counting machine.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Notice from the PET)

2. What to do with the wet & unreadable ballots 

• In a Resolution dated 5 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 5 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 26 June 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 26 June 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Manifestation with Motion regarding regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 6 July 2018 Strong Manifestation from BBM)

•  In a Resolution dated 10 July 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Strong Manifestation but deny his Motion to hold in abeyance the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 10 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 19 July 2018, BBM filed a Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images in the revision proceedings.

(click here to see the 19 July 2018 Strong Opposition from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to direct the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 31 July 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 31 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 14 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 14 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 17 August 2018, BBM received a Motion from the COMELEC asking for an extension of time within which to file its Comment.

(click here to see the 17 August 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 28 August 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the  28 August 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 30 August 2018, BBM received COMELEC’s Comment stating that the ballot images are not faithful reproduction of the original ballots but are instead the “true and genuine representation and captured images of the official ballots themselves.

(click here to see the 30 August 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 4 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 4 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 11 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 11 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 18 September 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 18 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 September 2018, BBM received a Notice from the PET denying his Strong Opposition regarding the use of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 25 September 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 October 2018, BBM filed a Manifestation of Appreciation with Omnibus Motion for partial reconsideration of the denial of his Strong Opposition.

(click here to see the 5 October 2018 Manifestation with Omnibus Motion from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 9 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 9 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Manifestation with Omnibus Motion and direct Robredo and the COMELEC to comment.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 16 October 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 16 October 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 6 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 6 November 2018, BBM recieved the COMELEC’s Motion for extension of time within which to file a comment.

(click here to see the 6 November 2018 Motion from the COMELEC)

• In a Resolution dated 13 November 2018, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 13 November 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 22 November 2018, BBM received Robredo’s Comment and Oppostion.

(click here to see the 22 November 2018 Comment from Robredo)

• In a Resolution dated 4 December 2018, the PET resolved to note the COMELEC’s Comment and required BBM to reply thereon.

(click here to see the 4 December 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 5 December 2018, BBM received the COMELEC’s Comment, stating BBM’s claim has “no leg to stand on.”

(click here to see the 5 December 2018 Comment from the COMELEC)

• On 20 December 2018, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 20 December 2018 Consolidated Reply from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 8 January 2019, the PET resolved to allow the revision of decrypted ballot images.

(click here to see the 8 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• In a Resolution dated 29 January 2019, the PET resolved to note BBM’s Consolidated Reply.

(click here to see the 29 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

N.B.
From Day 1, BBM’s position has always been as follows: because of the presence of squares instead of ovals in the ballot images, the same are no longer faithful images of the original paper ballots. Since these “decrypted” images have been compromised, they do not reflect the true will of the voting public.

3. COMELEC’s request to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) with respect to the Election Management System (EMS) Servers

• In a Resolution dated 17 April 2018, the PET required BBM and Robredo to comment on COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 17 April 2018 Resolution from the PET)

• On 25 May 2018, BBM filed his Opposition to COMELEC’s request.

(click here to see the 25 May 2018 Opposition from BBM)

• On 20 July 2018, BBM received a Reply from the COMELEC.

(click here to see the 20 July 2018 Reply from the COMELEC)

• To date, Robredo has NOT yet filed any comment regarding the above issue.

N.B.
The Election Management System (EMS) is the “brain” of any election system. It is here where the ballot images are generated and where the SD cards and computers for the different provinces are programmed. It is important to preserve the data in the EMS so the parties can easily track down any “hanky panky” that was done during the May 2016 elections.

• In a Resolution dated 24 July 2018, the PET resolved to lift the Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) on the Election Management System (EMS) servers.

(click here to see the 24 July 2018 Resolution from the PET)

4. BBM’s Third Cause of Action

• In a Resolution dated 29 August 2017, the PET directed BBM to submit a new list of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur and within five (5) days.

(click here to see the 29 August 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 September 2017, BBM filed his Compliance and submitted his list of witnesses.

(click here to see the 11 September 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 19 September 2017, the PET required BBM to “STRICTLY COMPLY with their directive that he identify his witnesses in the corresponding clustered precincts within a FINAL and NON-EXTENDIBLE period of five (5) days from notice.”

> It is worth mentioning that on 11 September 2017, BBM had already submitted 171 names of potential wirtnesses to the PET.

(click here to see the 19 September 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 9 October 2017, BBM complied with the PET’s directive and submitted 7,356 names of witnesses for the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur & Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 9 October 2017 Compliance from BBM)

• In a Resolution dated 7 November 2017, the PET “noted” BBM’s Compliance.

(click here to see the 7 November 2017 Resolution from the PET)

• On 12 December 2018, BBM filed his Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion requesting for the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to the COMELEC-ERSD to produce and submit the dactyloscopic and questioned document reports and such other relevant documents involving the technical examination conducted on the Voter’s Registration Records (VRRs) against the Election Day Computerized Voter’s List with Voting Records (EDCVLs) of 508 established precincts in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao relative to the protest of Tan vs. Hataman. BBM stated that he intends to use the said results as part of his evidence in support of his third cause of action, which is the Annulment of votes for the position of Vice President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.

(click here to see the 12 December 2018 Extremely Urgent Manifestation from BBM)

• On 18 January 2019, BBM received Robredo’s Counter-Manifestation with Comment and Opposition to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Motion.

(click here to see the 18 January 2019 Counter-Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 25 January 2019, BBM received a Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo.

(click here to see the 25 January 2019 Supplemental Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 28 January 2019, the PET directed Robredo and the COMELEC to comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 28 January 2019 Resolution from the PET)

• On 11 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation and Compliance from Robredo stating she previously filed her Comment and Opposition prior to the PET Resolution directing her to comment to BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation.

(click here to see the 11 February 2019 Manifestation from Robredo)

• On 13 February 2019, BBM received a Manifestation [in lieu of Comment on BBM’s Extremely Urgent Manifestation of Grave Concern with Omnibus Motion] from the COMELEC, stating the Second Division is yet to issue a Resolution or Order regarding the results of Sakur Tan’s Motion for Technical Examination. The COMELEC further said as this is the case, they are invoking the sub judice rule.

(click here to see the 13 February 2019 Manifestation from the COMELEC)

• On 26 March 2019, BBM filed his Consolidated Reply with Urgent Motion to Resolve Protestant’s Motion wherein he reiterated his Extremely Urgent Manifestation with Omnibus Motion, which was filed in December 2018.

(click here to see the 26 March 2019 Consiladated Reply with Urgent Motion from BBM)

N.B.
Despite the lapse of 10 months, and the submission of 7,356 potential witnesses, we are respectfully waiting for the PET to issue a directive on BBM’s Third Cause of Action (ie: “Annulment of votes for the position of Vice-President in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao)