By Jomar Canlas | The Manila Times
The Supreme Court has junked the appeal of Vice President Maria Leonor “Leni” Robredo to dismiss the election protest filed by former senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.
The court, sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), has given the go-signal to proceed with the revision and recount process of votes as it ordered the retrieval of ballot boxes and other election paraphernalia in three pilot provinces identified by Marcos.
In a 34-page Resolution dated August 29, the PET dismissed for lack of merit the motion for reconsideration filed by Robredo which sought to halt the Marcos election protest.
The high tribunal said Robredo’s arguments were merely rehashed and had been passed upon by the PET.
This means that the case filed by Marcos against Robredo can proceed.
“[F]inally, it is well to stress that the Motion for Reconsideration essentially restates the arguments contained in protestee’s (Robredo’s) Verified Answer and Counter-Protest, and these have already been duly considered and passed upon by the Tribunal in the Resolution dated January 24, 2017. The Tribunal finds no cogent reason to discuss these matters any further.”
In his protest, Marcos assailed the election results in 39,221 clustered precincts. He sought a recount in 36,465 precincts and the annulment of results in the remaining 2,756.
Based on the Commission on Elections (Comelec) data, the 39,221 clustered precincts are composed of 132,446 precincts.
Marcos, who lost to Robredo by only 263,473 votes, accused her of “massive electoral fraud, anomalies and irregularities” such as preshading of ballots, pre-loaded secure digital cards, misreading of ballots, malfunctioning VCMs (vote-counting machines), and an “abnormally high” unaccounted votes/undervotes for the position of VP.
Also, the PET has ordered the retrieval of all the ballot boxes and election paraphernalia in the pilot provinces of Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental.
“Thus in consonance with Rule 65, the Tribunal hereby orders that the retrieval of ballot boxes and other election documents, revision of ballots and reception of evidence can already begin with, but shall first be confined to, only the provinces that have been designated by protestant, namely Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental,” the ruling stated.
The PET also limited Marcos’ election protest to just two causes of actions – his second and third causes of action.
It ruled to dismiss the first cause of action, which calls for nullification of the results of the vice presidential race because of a “flawed Automated Election System (AES).
It argued that the dismissal aims to speed up the protest because it has been averred that even if Marcos proves the first cause of action, it would not mean he won the elections because this could only be determined by a manual recount of ballots in all precincts.
“Thus, the First Cause of Action may be dispensed with for judicial economy and prompt disposition of this case,” the PET stated.
The two other Causes of Action upheld by the PET is for the revision and recount of all voters’ receipts, elections returns and other pertinent documents, records and equipment in 27 provinces and highly urbanized cities used in the May 2016 elections and the plea to annul the election results in the provinces of Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur and Basilan because of “traditional” modes of cheating like vote buying, pre-shading of ballots, intimidation and failure of elections, among others.